1 |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> 090929 Paul Hartman wrote: |
3 |
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
4 |
>>> The one exception is Konsole, which is a shadow of 3.5.10 , |
5 |
>> According to changelog the KDE4 version of Konsole has added : |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Quick reactions, further advice welcome : |
8 |
> |
9 |
>> automatic tab titles (shows current directory) -- trivial |
10 |
>> split screen mode -- yes, mb useful, but similar to tabs |
11 |
>> performance increase on scrolling large terminals -- don't need it |
12 |
>> better profile set-up dialogs -- yes, but they still don't work properly |
13 |
>> runs all Konsole sessions from a single process -- useful for what ? |
14 |
>> can use personalized profile in embedded Konsoles -- don't need it |
15 |
>> easy SSH session bookmarking -- can't find it |
16 |
>> much improved search -- no sign of it (present in 3.5.10) |
17 |
>> real transparency -- don't need it |
18 |
>> new themes -- don't need them (I use Fluxbox) |
19 |
>> open your GUI file manager in the current directory -- trivial |
20 |
>> mouse-wheel scrolls pgms that don't naturally support it (eg Less) -- yes |
21 |
> |
22 |
> So yes, a couple of small items I mt use occasionally. |
23 |
> |
24 |
>> What's missing from the 3.x series ? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> A much longer list of schemas, start root console, search (see above), |
27 |
> set window geometry (inside Konsole or when starting it: see my bug list). |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I am hopeful the KDE devs will restore more with 4.4.1 & 4.5.1 , |
30 |
> but it hasn't happened yet. |
31 |
|
32 |
Hi, |
33 |
|
34 |
Points well taken; I don't use the features you're missing and |
35 |
honestly I don't use most of the new ones either. :) "Open Browser |
36 |
Here" is the most useful one to me (it even works in Midnight |
37 |
Commander relative to which pane is currently active). |
38 |
|
39 |
In re-reading my previous message to you in this thread I hope it |
40 |
didn't seem confrontational to you, or if it led people to pile on, |
41 |
that was not my intention at all. I was simply curious what was |
42 |
missing since the few features I use seemed to have gone unchanged or |
43 |
been improved. So my apologies in case you took it that way. Often |
44 |
I'll write short, direct e-mails on these lists while I'm on a phone |
45 |
call or doing other things and sometimes lack the forethought or |
46 |
communication skills necessary to convey the |
47 |
almost-certainly-always-good-spirited nature of my question. :) |
48 |
|
49 |
Thanks |
50 |
Paul |