1 |
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:45:12 -0600, Dale wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > init thingies have changed a lot since your Mandr{ake,iva} |
4 |
> > experiences. The way the kernel handles them is very different and |
5 |
> > the tools used to build them have changed greatly. Mandrake used |
6 |
> > their on init thingy builder, as did most distros, whereas we now |
7 |
> > have a standardised tool that works well in a greater range of |
8 |
> > situations. |
9 |
|
10 |
> I've already had one fail on Gentoo. It was about the 2nd or 3rd time I |
11 |
> rebooted after starting to use it. The tools may have changed but the |
12 |
> experience hasn't. It's one reason why I make certain to keep older |
13 |
> kernels/init thingys around so that I can boot. |
14 |
|
15 |
That's just sensible, although a new combination is more likely to fail |
16 |
because of the kernel than the init thingy. |
17 |
|
18 |
> I don't see me liking the init thingys in my lifetime. I'm to old to |
19 |
> start trusting them given the large number of failures I've had. |
20 |
|
21 |
You should try building your own. It's explained in the kernel docs and |
22 |
is a simple process. Once you have done it yourself a few times, you'll |
23 |
feel far more comfortable with the whole idea; then you can go back to |
24 |
doing it the lazy way. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Neil Bothwick |
29 |
|
30 |
I just took an IQ test. The results were negative. |