| 1 |
Bo, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Gotcha, I didn't realize it was an overlay. Thanks for the input. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 7/1/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On Saturday 01 July 2006 17:32, Jason Weisberger wrote: |
| 8 |
> > I believe that missing keyword stuff can be unmasked if you put |
| 9 |
> > x11-libs/libdrm - in your package.keywords. This is just a guess, but I |
| 10 |
> > think it should work. This isn't a fix, you should probably file a |
| 11 |
> > bugzilla report on it, as nothing in the package database should be |
| 12 |
> without |
| 13 |
> > a keyword. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> The ebuilds that the OP is referring to is not in the tree. They are from |
| 16 |
> the |
| 17 |
> portage-xgl overlay. This overlay contains alpha software which is nowhere |
| 18 |
> near stable. Also the fact that a package is masked by missing keyword |
| 19 |
> simply |
| 20 |
> indicates that the package has not been tested on your architecture.. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> -- |
| 23 |
> Bo Andresen |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Jason Weisberger |
| 31 |
jbdubbs@×××××.com |
Archives