1 |
Looking at all replies - I think working on |
2 |
older gentoo would most likely cause problems. |
3 |
I am thinking of going for latest livecd - 2008 release. |
4 |
|
5 |
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> On Saturday 02 May 2009 19:14:45 Nitin Kanaskar wrote: |
7 |
>> Ok - I am not clear about the terminology - |
8 |
>> packages, versions... |
9 |
>> But i need to install gentoo 2004/2005 - if this |
10 |
>> is right. I am a graduate student doing research on |
11 |
>> vulnerabilities, exploits and IDS. Hence I am looking |
12 |
>> for older gentoo installations which i know have |
13 |
>> some vulnerabilities. |
14 |
>> If i have to build whole OS from source, I am willing |
15 |
>> to do that - but could not find any resource on that |
16 |
>> old stuff. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I may have a copy of the 2005.0 livecd lying around somewhere. If I find it, |
19 |
> I'll put a copy on my ftp server for you. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> But I see some problems with what you are trying to do: |
22 |
> |
23 |
> 1. source repositories for code changes over time. 2004/2005 ebuilds may have |
24 |
> SRC_URIs that simply do not exist any more. Major packages (such as most of |
25 |
> system) will likely not be a problem, but minor packages may well be |
26 |
> problematic. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> 2. All gentoo ebuilds ever shipped are in cvs or svn somewhere. It was Neil |
29 |
> Bothwick or Iain Buchanan who recently posted a URL, with luck the right man |
30 |
> will see this and report. However, I do not know of a way to extract the |
31 |
> entire portage tree as it was at a point in time. This too will be |
32 |
> problematic. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> -- |
36 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |