Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nitin Kanaskar <nitinvk04@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gentoo older versions
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 18:08:11
Message-Id: e318a6a80905021108n2cb38bacv27e8aae29abb753e@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gentoo older versions by Alan McKinnon
1 Looking at all replies - I think working on
2 older gentoo would most likely cause problems.
3 I am thinking of going for latest livecd - 2008 release.
4
5 On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
6 > On Saturday 02 May 2009 19:14:45 Nitin Kanaskar wrote:
7 >> Ok - I am not clear about the terminology -
8 >> packages, versions...
9 >> But i need to install gentoo 2004/2005 - if this
10 >> is right. I am a graduate student doing research on
11 >> vulnerabilities, exploits and IDS. Hence I am looking
12 >> for older gentoo installations which i know have
13 >> some vulnerabilities.
14 >> If i have to build whole OS from source, I am willing
15 >> to do that - but could not find any resource on that
16 >> old stuff.
17 >
18 > I may have a copy of the 2005.0 livecd lying around somewhere. If I find it,
19 > I'll put a copy on my ftp server for you.
20 >
21 > But I see some problems with what you are trying to do:
22 >
23 > 1. source repositories for code changes over time. 2004/2005 ebuilds may have
24 > SRC_URIs that simply do not exist any more. Major packages (such as most of
25 > system) will likely not be a problem, but minor packages may well be
26 > problematic.
27 >
28 > 2. All gentoo ebuilds ever shipped are in cvs or svn somewhere. It was Neil
29 > Bothwick or Iain Buchanan who recently posted a URL, with luck the right man
30 > will see this and report. However, I do not know of a way to extract the
31 > entire portage tree as it was at a point in time. This too will be
32 > problematic.
33 >
34 >
35 > --
36 > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
37 >
38 >