Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: portage-utils-0.61 Bug or feature?
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:29:21
Message-Id: 20160215212904.1ac49be1@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: portage-utils-0.61 Bug or feature? by "»Q«"
1 On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:38:28 -0600, »Q« wrote:
2
3 > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:29:49 -0800
4 > walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >
6 > > After today's update from 0.60 to 0.61 I noticed that the behavior of
7 > > qlop changed. Until today the command 'qlop -l' lists every package
8 > > in /var/log/emerge.log in chronological order.
9 > >
10 > > Today 'qlop -l' lists nothing unless you supply an argument, e.g.
11 > > 'qlop -l mesa', which lists every package with the string mesa in the
12 > > name.
13 > >
14 > > Is this change deliberate? (If so, I vote against it :)
15 >
16 > I dunno, and I'm still using 0.59, but if the change was
17 > deliberate, 'qlop -l -' or 'qlop -l /' should still work to list them
18 > all.
19
20 I thought the same, but it doesn't. qlop appears to need an exact package
21 name now
22
23 qlop -l portage-utils - works as expected
24 qlop -l portage-util - no output
25
26 Fortunately, genlop still works.
27
28
29 --
30 Neil Bothwick
31
32 PCMCIA: People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms