| 1 |
why? - threads "sounds" like a good thing, but is it really if its |
| 2 |
optional? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Its looking like threads minus is the way to go for php as geos needs |
| 5 |
php built with -threads - I now suspect I am going to be locked into one |
| 6 |
way (hopefully there is one way!) once I sort out the build |
| 7 |
dependencies. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
BillK |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 16:57 -0600, Kevin Brandstatter wrote: |
| 12 |
> I would suggest using threads |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -Kevin B |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:35 PM, William Kenworthy |
| 19 |
> <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
| 20 |
> ok, major update time and I am again in a bind with the |
| 21 |
> threads use |
| 22 |
> flag. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> PHP wants it, or doesnt and so does/doesnt apache and they |
| 25 |
> wont play |
| 26 |
> nice. So if I have to go back and rebuild a whole lot of |
| 27 |
> stuff one way |
| 28 |
> or the other which should it be? - +threads for both, neither, |
| 29 |
> one |
| 30 |
> enabled ... no choice will be pain free :( |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Its a mainly desktop system running almost everything but |
| 33 |
> generally |
| 34 |
> lightly loaded. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Suggestions? |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> BillK |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> |
Archives