1 |
well i guess it depends if your using php that takes advantage of |
2 |
concurrency. If you dont then threads arent necessary, |
3 |
for apache i would recommend threads because it does make use of them. |
4 |
|
5 |
Kevin B |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
> why? - threads "sounds" like a good thing, but is it really if its |
11 |
> optional? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Its looking like threads minus is the way to go for php as geos needs |
14 |
> php built with -threads - I now suspect I am going to be locked into one |
15 |
> way (hopefully there is one way!) once I sort out the build |
16 |
> dependencies. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> BillK |
19 |
> |
20 |
> On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 16:57 -0600, Kevin Brandstatter wrote: |
21 |
> > I would suggest using threads |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > -Kevin B |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:35 PM, William Kenworthy |
28 |
> > <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
29 |
> > ok, major update time and I am again in a bind with the |
30 |
> > threads use |
31 |
> > flag. |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > PHP wants it, or doesnt and so does/doesnt apache and they |
34 |
> > wont play |
35 |
> > nice. So if I have to go back and rebuild a whole lot of |
36 |
> > stuff one way |
37 |
> > or the other which should it be? - +threads for both, neither, |
38 |
> > one |
39 |
> > enabled ... no choice will be pain free :( |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > Its a mainly desktop system running almost everything but |
42 |
> > generally |
43 |
> > lightly loaded. |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> > Suggestions? |
46 |
> > |
47 |
> > BillK |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> |
55 |
> |
56 |
> |
57 |
> |