1 |
On Aug 14, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Joe Menola wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sunday August 14 2005 5:43 pm, Paul Hoy wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> On Aug 14, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Joe Menola wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> On Sunday August 14 2005 2:42 pm, Paul Hoy wrote: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> Linux from Scratch looks very interesting: it appears to rapidly |
10 |
>>>> support |
11 |
>>>> the latest updates and it has decent documentation. Does any one |
12 |
>>>> have any |
13 |
>>>> perspectives on Linux from Scratch, from a Gentoo point-of-view? |
14 |
>>>> Does |
15 |
>>>> anyone wish to share a comparison of the two? |
16 |
>>>> |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> I've built both Gentoo and LFS. A side by side comparison comes up |
19 |
>>> pretty much |
20 |
>>> equal. Except for documentation, where Gentoo wins hands down. IMO |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>> google>"gentoo"=3,990,000 hits |
23 |
>>> google>"lfs"=877,000 hits |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>> -jm |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> Hi Joe, |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> What about the LFS community - did you find it helpful? |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> Of course, the answer is probably objective. Developer types may not |
35 |
>> have to rely so much on community whereas those who have the great |
36 |
>> capacity to take forever to understand the point, like myself, |
37 |
>> require a good community. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>> Also, I agree with you that the Gentoo documentation (most of it) is |
40 |
>> excellent; I've printed, and have read most of it. |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> One more question, and it's the most obvious. You said that Gentoo |
43 |
>> and LFS are more or less equal. So, that begs the question: what |
44 |
>> persuaded you to stick with Gentoo? |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>> Thanks , |
47 |
>> Paul |
48 |
>> |
49 |
> |
50 |
> The LFs community was very helpful, I couldn't have built a working |
51 |
> system |
52 |
> without them. :) |
53 |
> I just find it easier when Goggle finds other documented problems |
54 |
> that match |
55 |
> mine. The size of the Gentoo user base makes this much more likely |
56 |
> with |
57 |
> Gentoo vs LFS. |
58 |
> To answer the obvious...Gentoo is easier to build then LFS. LFS's |
59 |
> style of |
60 |
> package by package installing is great for learning the workings of |
61 |
> Linux, |
62 |
> and I wouldn't trade-in my experience with LFS for anything. |
63 |
|
64 |
Yes, that's what attracted me to Gentoo and to LFS/BLFS also: I'm |
65 |
interested in learning the inner workings of Linux. I've hacked |
66 |
around with Linux since the very early days of Redhat, but I still |
67 |
don't have a comprehensive understanding of the OS. This is despite |
68 |
that fact that I usually used tarballs rather than RPMs, even in |
69 |
Redhat and Fedora. |
70 |
|
71 |
> But starting from scratch with LFS and obtaining a working Kde |
72 |
> desktop took me (from |
73 |
> memory) a few weeks to build. With Gentoo, I was there in a few |
74 |
> days thanks |
75 |
> to "emerge kde-meta". |
76 |
> |
77 |
|
78 |
Yeah, there were even some pre-compiled Linux distros in which it |
79 |
took a long time to get a Gnome desktop (vlos and foresight linux, |
80 |
for instance). Like you, it took me a few days to get a working Gnome |
81 |
desktop with Gentoo. |
82 |
|
83 |
> -jm |
84 |
> -- |
85 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
86 |
> |
87 |
> |
88 |
|
89 |
|
90 |
Thanks, Joe. This is the kind of conversation I was looking for. |
91 |
-- |
92 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |