| 1 |
Am 17.09.2013 09:20, schrieb Grant: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Performance doesn't seem to be one of ZFS's strong points. Is it |
| 4 |
> considered suitable for a high-performance server? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
A high performance server for what? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
But you've already given yourself the answer: if high performance is |
| 9 |
what you are aiming for it depends on your performance needs and |
| 10 |
probably ZFS on Linux is not got to meet those - yet. It is still evolving. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Of course benchmarks are static, real world usage is another cup of coffee. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Besides performance, are there any drawbacks to ZFS compared to ext4? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Well it only comes as kernel module at the moment. Some people dislike |
| 17 |
that. |
Archives