| 1 |
On 10/05/2013 12:00, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal |
| 5 |
>> with a GPT disk. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some remnants |
| 8 |
>> of that are left around confusing fdisk. He wants the remnants to go |
| 9 |
>> away and needs to know what bit of the disk to dd and make that happen. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> I don't know the answer to that. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That's not quite how I read it, but... gdisk has an option to completely |
| 14 |
> erase both GPT and DOS partition tables. Why anyone would choose to use |
| 15 |
> the ultra-kludged DOS partition tables when GPT is so much more elegant is |
| 16 |
> beyond me, unless they have old hardware that can't read a GPT disk. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The usual reasons I suppose: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
habit, familiarity, lack of new knowledge, fear of the unknown |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I myself still use fdisk whenever I can. I know I should change, I know |
| 23 |
it would be good, but I'm an old fart and mostly can't be arsed :-) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 28 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives