1 |
120810 Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> On Aug 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net>wrote: |
3 |
>> The latest thing of any significance I can think of |
4 |
>> is the removal of lumpy reclaim in 3.4 |
5 |
>> which has something to do with reducing memory fragmentation |
6 |
>> in systems under memory stress. LWN has a subscriber-only article |
7 |
>> about the change causing performance regressions. |
8 |
>> I doubt it could cause an improvement in this particular situation. |
9 |
|
10 |
On my system, swapping was eliminated after installing Kernel 3.4.0 . |
11 |
|
12 |
> I honestly think anyone having difficulties with swap should check out |
13 |
> the vm.swappiness sysctl before looking anywhere else. |
14 |
> Setting it to 0 is much like removing swap, |
15 |
> except you still have the swap space if you actually need it. |
16 |
> On my work laptop, it looks like it defaults to a value of 60. |
17 |
|
18 |
For some years, I have set swappiness at 10 . |
19 |
|
20 |
My best guess after the various comments (thanks) |
21 |
is that it resulted from the code clean-up in Libre Office |
22 |
& that my memory was faulty in believing it had also happened with Firefox. |
23 |
It shouldn't have happened previously, as I have 4 GB RAM |
24 |
& lots of temporary disk space for Portage to use. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
========================,,============================================ |
28 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
29 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
30 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |