| 1 |
On Oct 6, 2011 8:10 PM, "Peter Humphrey" <peter@××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Thursday 06 October 2011 17:40:33 Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Am 06.10.2011 17:25, schrieb Michael Mol: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > >> Let's hold a poll. How many list readers get it? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > > It's not c which is in doubt, but its function as an upper limit. ;) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > And even if the results a true and not an error then there is a list of |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > possible explanations. Most of them leave c as upper limit in place. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > Quantum Mechanics has many aces in his sleeve like micro wormholes or |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> > traveling through higher dimensions. All these dimensions from string |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> > theorie must be good for something ;-) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Just think of the consequences if c is not the ultimate speed limit. I am, |
| 27 |
and they're so numerous that I can't even contemplate them all. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Avoiding fantasizing about FTL physical travel, FTL information transfer |
| 30 |
using nutrinos strikes me as the most fascinating prospect. Imagine being |
| 31 |
able to set up a direct point-to-point link through the globe. Skip surface |
| 32 |
latency, get a direct Gigabit link between, e.g. Australia and the US. |
Archives