| 1 |
On Thursday 06 October 2011 17:40:33 Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 06.10.2011 17:25, schrieb Michael Mol: |
| 3 |
> >> Let's hold a poll. How many list readers get it? |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > It's not c which is in doubt, but its function as an upper limit. ;) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> And even if the results a true and not an error then there is a list of |
| 8 |
> possible explanations. Most of them leave c as upper limit in place. |
| 9 |
> Quantum Mechanics has many aces in his sleeve like micro wormholes or |
| 10 |
> traveling through higher dimensions. All these dimensions from string |
| 11 |
> theorie must be good for something ;-) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Just think of the consequences if c is not the ultimate speed limit. I am, |
| 14 |
and they're so numerous that I can't even contemplate them all. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Rgds |
| 18 |
Peter Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23 |
Archives