| 1 |
On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 01:08:24 +0100 |
| 2 |
Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thursday 06 October 2011 17:40:33 Sebastian Beßler wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Am 06.10.2011 17:25, schrieb Michael Mol: |
| 6 |
> > >> Let's hold a poll. How many list readers get it? |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > It's not c which is in doubt, but its function as an upper |
| 9 |
> > > limit. ;) |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > And even if the results a true and not an error then there is a |
| 12 |
> > list of possible explanations. Most of them leave c as upper limit |
| 13 |
> > in place. Quantum Mechanics has many aces in his sleeve like micro |
| 14 |
> > wormholes or traveling through higher dimensions. All these |
| 15 |
> > dimensions from string theorie must be good for something ;-) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Just think of the consequences if c is not the ultimate speed limit. |
| 18 |
> I am, and they're so numerous that I can't even contemplate them all. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Permit me to direct you to the pearl of wisdom about that in the movie |
| 21 |
K-Pax |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 27 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives