1 |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On 2014-02-20 12:43 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Tanstaafl<tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |
5 |
>> wrote: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> On 2014-02-19 2:04 AM, Daniel Campbell<lists@××××××××.us> wrote: |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>> For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be chosen as |
11 |
>>>> the default. |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> Ridiculous. Forget about Canek's rant... |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> This is about *choice*. Also, I would argue the *opposite of what Canek |
17 |
>>> is |
18 |
>>> saying in this last rant... |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
>> Tanstaafl, can we please not use terms like "rants"? I'm just giving |
22 |
>> my opinion, trying to be respectful and civil to the others |
23 |
>> participants in this thread. I would appreciate if you do the same to |
24 |
>> me. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Sorry, Canek, no offense was intended, but if you go back and re-read your |
28 |
> 'extremely overly enthusiastic' post (this plus the content is why I |
29 |
> referred to it as a 'rant'), |
30 |
|
31 |
Thanks for the explanation. |
32 |
|
33 |
> while I agree with most everything you said, |
34 |
> your primary point - that it should be the people who *don't* want systemd |
35 |
> doing all of the work - was backwards, and that was what I wanted to point |
36 |
> out. |
37 |
|
38 |
I still believe that a non-systemd profile should be done by the |
39 |
people not wanting to use systemd. But since I now support the systemd |
40 |
profile (since it's trivial) the point is moot. |
41 |
|
42 |
> So, please, don't take it as an insult. In fact you have done a very good |
43 |
> job of patiently spelling out the advantages of systemd, to the point I'm no |
44 |
> longer afraid of it taking over and devouring the linux world. |
45 |
|
46 |
Thanks. |
47 |
|
48 |
> That said, in reality, there is (or should be) nothing inherently insulting |
49 |
> about a claim that something you (or anyone) says was a 'rant'. Pretty much |
50 |
> everyone I know who has strong opinions on things like this rants all the |
51 |
> time. Sometimes those rants have more value/substance than others. A good |
52 |
> rant will provide lots of substantive supporting documentation backing up |
53 |
> the claims in the rant. A bad rant just makes a bunch of baseless claims |
54 |
> and/or personal attacks. |
55 |
|
56 |
I don't think I was shouting (which I believe is part of the "rant" |
57 |
definition); but whatever, I now understand you didn't mean any harm |
58 |
and I appreciate it. |
59 |
|
60 |
> Bottom line: since Gentoo's default and primary init system is (and |
61 |
> hopefully will be for a very long time) OpenRC, it is on the systemd folks |
62 |
> to do the work to get systemd fully supported. |
63 |
|
64 |
Which has been the case up until now. |
65 |
|
66 |
Regards. |
67 |
-- |
68 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
69 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
70 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |