| 1 |
On 2009-10-02, Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> It's a distribution where you have to choose your own system |
| 4 |
> logger and compile your own kernel, but when it comes to the |
| 5 |
> text editor they decide to "hold your hand" with nano? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Some of us who are vimpaired think of it more as they decided |
| 8 |
not to "whack you across the kneecaps" with vi. ;) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't like nano much either -- I find it rather clumsy, but |
| 11 |
at least it seems to be "safe". It doesn't trash my file every |
| 12 |
30 seconds when I start typing content while in command mode. |
| 13 |
Honestly -- I've used vi infrequently but regularly (probably |
| 14 |
several times a month) for decades, and my brain just doesn't |
| 15 |
work the way vi does. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Is my fallout shelter |
| 19 |
at termite proof? |
| 20 |
visi.com |
Archives