| 1 |
On Sunday 16 August 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 16 August 2009 18:40:12 M Daniel R M wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Konqueror: very stable indeed, but it couldn't be at another way since |
| 4 |
> > it's a key piece of the KDE environment... The problem comes when I want |
| 5 |
> > to fill in forms (you know... web pages for registering, etc.). It stops |
| 6 |
> > many times without giving us an alert message or some kind of |
| 7 |
> > explanation, so you have to deduce that the problem is not from the |
| 8 |
> > website, but the browser instead. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I don't know whether problems come from java or whatever..., I've |
| 11 |
> > checked my konqueror preferences and I'd bet they are all OK.. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> javascript support in konqueror sucks. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> For everything else it's actually OK. One of these days it will use webkit |
| 16 |
> as the backend and then things might improve. Until then, I'm afraid you |
| 17 |
> are SOL. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Perhaps [O/T] but is webkit a fork of khtml, or was khtml stopped any |
| 20 |
development and webkit took over? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Mick |
Archives