1 |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 18:50, daid kahl <daidxor@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> As a simple idea, cron task starts rsnapshot configured however. When |
4 |
> this is done, backup is tarballed, and tarball is given as like, say, |
5 |
> 440 permissions, where users are in some useful 'backup' group, then |
6 |
> while tarball can be read to be passed across server, if tarball is |
7 |
> extracted, user has no more privs then they have on the system anyway |
8 |
> (I'm not saying chmod -R). Then local tarball can be removed or |
9 |
> whatever. |
10 |
|
11 |
It's not a bad idea, but you need enough free space on the client to |
12 |
backup the entire system (which for me is not the case). Secondly, |
13 |
every backup you do is a full backup as rsnapshot needs to access a |
14 |
backup todo a incremental backup. You could mess around with something |
15 |
like sshfs but's it's not great either. A straight rsync between |
16 |
client and server could do it but it would suprise me if this doesn't |
17 |
already exist in some form. |
18 |
|
19 |
Regards, |
20 |
|
21 |
Ward |