| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:09:15 -0600 |
| 4 |
Michael Sullivan <michael@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> We use evolution. I tried using Squirrelmail and got this: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Message not sent. Server replied: |
| 9 |
> Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable |
| 10 |
> 550 Rejected: spam score 6.5 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Ah, I see. Exim does output a 550 anyway (and it makes some sense, I |
| 13 |
guess the SMTP protocol definition is impractical w/ regard to the |
| 14 |
allowed errors). But reading the full error report, it seems it's your |
| 15 |
spam detection software that leads exim to deny the mail. Your exim |
| 16 |
config seems to indicate that everything with a spam score > 6.0 is to |
| 17 |
be denied (those numbers in the config are given with a factor of ten, |
| 18 |
I guess?). Depending on whether the full spam check report is available |
| 19 |
on the logs, you might want to temporarly disable that mail denial and |
| 20 |
check the mail headers for the protocol of which certain spam checks |
| 21 |
leads your spam filter to the conclusion it is spam, then adjust that. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-hwh |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives