| 1 |
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:47 +0100, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:12:10 -0600 (CST) |
| 5 |
> "Michael Sullivan" <michael@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > I own espersunited.com, so it is on my end. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> ...and so should be exim's logs, right? I usually find it easier to read |
| 10 |
> actual error reports than (stripped) configurations for complex |
| 11 |
> software that is claimed to be responsible for the error... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Also, I have a hard time trying to understand the problem. A mailbox |
| 14 |
> unavailable shouldn't occur after SMTP's "DATA" command, it should |
| 15 |
> happen after the "RCPT TO" (answer code 450). At that point, no data has |
| 16 |
> been transmitted, so the error does not make sense except if it is |
| 17 |
> wrongly phrased by the MUA or (sorry) you. SMTP doesn't allow it at |
| 18 |
> that point. There's only the possibility for much more general error |
| 19 |
> codes. BTW, what's the MUA? You just introduced the MTA. Did you try |
| 20 |
> another one? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> -hwh |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
We use evolution. I tried using Squirrelmail and got this: |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Message not sent. Server replied: |
| 27 |
Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable |
| 28 |
550 Rejected: spam score 6.5 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives