1 |
On Sunday 06 January 2008, Michael Sullivan wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:47 +0100, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:12:10 -0600 (CST) |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > "Michael Sullivan" <michael@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
> > > I own espersunited.com, so it is on my end. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > ...and so should be exim's logs, right? I usually find it easier to |
11 |
> > read actual error reports than (stripped) configurations for |
12 |
> > complex software that is claimed to be responsible for the error... |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Also, I have a hard time trying to understand the problem. A |
15 |
> > mailbox unavailable shouldn't occur after SMTP's "DATA" command, it |
16 |
> > should happen after the "RCPT TO" (answer code 450). At that point, |
17 |
> > no data has been transmitted, so the error does not make sense |
18 |
> > except if it is wrongly phrased by the MUA or (sorry) you. SMTP |
19 |
> > doesn't allow it at that point. There's only the possibility for |
20 |
> > much more general error codes. BTW, what's the MUA? You just |
21 |
> > introduced the MTA. Did you try another one? |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > -hwh |
24 |
> |
25 |
> We use evolution. I tried using Squirrelmail and got this: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Message not sent. Server replied: |
28 |
> Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable |
29 |
> 550 Rejected: spam score 6.5 |
30 |
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
31 |
|
32 |
perhaps this bit? |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Alan McKinnon |
36 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |