| 1 |
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:46:33 +0800 |
| 3 |
> Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> > |
| 6 |
>> > A concensus would be good. A right consensus is more likely to get a |
| 7 |
>> > consensus. This has no bearing on the matters at hand. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> /usr as the default prefix for installed packages is the "consensus" |
| 10 |
>> of the vast majority of packages out there. Why do you think this has |
| 11 |
>> no bearing on their consideration? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'm just pointing out that despite what many seem to state there are |
| 14 |
> losses and unclear/non forth coming positive reasons or real benefits |
| 15 |
> to the current apparently to be imposed or your doomed "consensus" of |
| 16 |
> consolidating data. Once your at multi-user the whole filesystem is one |
| 17 |
> for all intensive purposes anyway and so much of what you have said is |
| 18 |
> misleading. It really shouldn't be a difficult problem to fix, it is |
| 19 |
> just data after all. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'm having trouble understanding the whole paragraph - my English |
| 22 |
parser must have been broken with my last emerge -uDNtav world. I'd |
| 23 |
revdep-rebuild, but my /usr is on nfs and rebuilding the binaries |
| 24 |
there would break them for the other shared clients. ;) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social |
| 28 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no |
| 29 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none |
Archives