| 1 |
On Sonntag, 23. April 2017 07:56:05 CEST J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok. /etc/portage/package.use.unmask doesn't work. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
First, there is no package.use.unmask (although I'll grant that that would be |
| 5 |
the intuitive name for such a file). There is only package.use.mask and |
| 6 |
package.use.stable.mask, which can reside in the portage tree and in /etc/ |
| 7 |
portage/profile/. portage(5) has this to say (see especially the second |
| 8 |
example): |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
package.use.mask and package.use.stable.mask |
| 11 |
Per-package USE flag masks. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Note: In a cascading profile setup, you can remove USE |
| 14 |
flags in children profiles which were added by parent profiles by prefixing |
| 15 |
the flag with a '-'. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Format: |
| 18 |
- comments begin with # (no inline comments) |
| 19 |
- one DEPEND atom per line with space-delimited USE flags |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Example: |
| 22 |
# mask docs for GTK 2.x |
| 23 |
=x11-libs/gtk+-2* doc |
| 24 |
# unmask mysql support for QT |
| 25 |
x11-libs/qt -mysql |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
In this particular case, both files can be used, it seems (I'm not sure what |
| 28 |
the "stable" refers to in this case, it's probably explained on the Gentoo |
| 29 |
wiki somewhere or in the developer documentation). |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
HTH |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Marc Joliet |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
| 36 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
Archives