| 1 |
On Samstag 22 Mai 2010, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
> [...] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > because you're not using software that needs good latency, like software |
| 6 |
> > synthesizers) but I do. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Then you're doing it wrong. If you are doing professional audio (a |
| 9 |
> little fact, that, by the way, you *NEVER* mentioned; you talked about |
| 10 |
> boot times and FPS in games, but not about professional audio), using |
| 11 |
> PulseAudio it's not going to work for you. Lennart himself said so. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> But even in the case of professional audio, OSS4 is not the answer. |
| 14 |
> Because the mixing it belongs in user space, not the kernel. The |
| 15 |
> answer you should look at, is Jack: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> http://jackaudio.org/ |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> And Jack runs in user space, obviously, and on top of ALSA. And it has |
| 20 |
> *incredible* low latencies; you should try it Lennart wrote a |
| 21 |
> comparison between Jack and PulseAudio: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/when-pa-and-when-not.html |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Regards. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
your posts are in vain. He wants to troll and just show how 'superior' OSSv4 |
| 28 |
is. To do that he uses the crappiest solutions, whines a lot and ignores |
| 29 |
facts. |
Archives