| 1 |
On 2012-03-14 9:03 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> *YOUR WIFE'S LAPTOP* won't boot properly without /usr on /, or an |
| 3 |
> initramfs. OK, put /usr on /, or an initramfs*ON YOUR WIFE'S LAPTOP*. |
| 4 |
> I don't have a problem with that. What gets people really upset is the |
| 5 |
> dog-in-the-manger attitude of "if my complex/corner-case machine won't |
| 6 |
> boot up without /usr on /, or an initramfs, then by golly*NOBODY'S* |
| 7 |
> machine will be allowed to boot up without /usr on /, or an initramfs". |
| 8 |
> My machine does not use bluetooth/other-weird-stuff. udev doesn't need |
| 9 |
> to find bluetooth drivers on /usr on my machine. Why is udev being |
| 10 |
> deliberately broken to not work on*EVERYBODY'S* machine if they don't |
| 11 |
> have /usr on /, or an initramfs? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Why can't this argument simply be satisfied with one or more new profiles? |
Archives