Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: What's happened to gentoo-sources?
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 02:39:02
Message-Id: 20160901213831.213dbada@sepulchrave.remarqs
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What's happened to gentoo-sources? by Neil Bothwick
1 On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 22:56:31 +0100
2 Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3
4 > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 22:08:19 +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
5
6 > > Removal of a 4.6 series ebuild also means there would follow no
7 > > updates
8 >
9 > Are there any updates to the 4.6 series or was is 4.7 considered its
10 > successor by the kernels devs? If the former, I can understand your
11 > point. If the latter, there would be no updates so there is no point.
12
13 The latter. The announcement of that is probably what prompted the
14 tree-cleaning.
15 <http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1608.2/00687.html>