| 1 |
On Sunday, March 08, 2015 11:11:49 AM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > Are the ownership and mode of |
| 5 |
> > > > "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the |
| 6 |
> > > > two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it |
| 7 |
> > > > formatted correctly? |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > The /boot partition in UEFI systems needs to be vfat. Permissions are |
| 10 |
> > > not gonna matter that much in that. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > But filename lengths may do. What is the maximum length for FAT32? Is it |
| 13 |
> > possible both files are considered the same? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> In that case, it would not work in my case, and it does (see my last |
| 16 |
> reply). Besides, it has been working with those filenames for months now. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> FAT32 supports (IIRC) 256 long filenames. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Canek, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't see these long filenames in your filetree-listing. |
| 23 |
You have a directory with the UUID, but then just the kernel-version numbers. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Or am I looking at the wrong email? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Joost |
Archives