Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gummiboot does not display new kernel
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 17:12:19
Message-Id: CADPrc80n=igdwchhPkqy8dMXDbN0XDU+GvxoOJ1peya2zRoqgQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] gummiboot does not display new kernel by Neil Bothwick
1 On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:51:38 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
4 >
5 > > > Are the ownership and mode of
6 > > > "e55a6b6a09bd2b1c50216272545a8d1f-3.19.1-gentoo.conf" the same as the
7 > > > two others (although I'd assume that it wouldn't matter) and is it
8 > > > formatted correctly?
9 > >
10 > > The /boot partition in UEFI systems needs to be vfat. Permissions are
11 > > not gonna matter that much in that.
12 >
13 > But filename lengths may do. What is the maximum length for FAT32? Is it
14 > possible both files are considered the same?
15
16 In that case, it would not work in my case, and it does (see my last
17 reply). Besides, it has been working with those filenames for months now.
18
19 FAT32 supports (IIRC) 256 long filenames.
20
21 Regards.
22 --
23 Canek Peláez Valdés
24 Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
25 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] gummiboot does not display new kernel "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>