| 1 |
On Dec 7, 2007 4:37 PM, Bo Ørsted Andresen <bo.andresen@××××.dk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 07 December 2007 16:21:31 Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 3 |
> > So the expectation should be, that it's not going to be possible |
| 4 |
> > to preselect an mta the way I've shown, as soon as virtual/mta |
| 5 |
> > is converted to a new style virtual. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Is that right? Is there work going on to change all the old |
| 8 |
> > style virtuals to new style ones? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> You are right except for the fact that virtual/mta will not be converted any |
| 11 |
> time soon (if ever). Old style virtuals allow their providers to block all |
| 12 |
> other providers by blocking the virtual. This isn't possible with the current |
| 13 |
> format for new style virtuals so it isn't going to happen. editor didn't need |
| 14 |
> that feature and thus could easily be converted... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Ah, okay. Pretty bad situation, though, isn't it? I mean, |
| 17 |
with the way it is now, we've got some virtuals which |
| 18 |
work with virtuals and some, which don't. Do you happen |
| 19 |
to know, if there's a bug which should rectify this |
| 20 |
broken situation? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Alexander |
| 23 |
éí¢‹¬z¸ žÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |
Archives