| 1 |
On Friday 07 December 2007 18:58:57 Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 2 |
> > You are right except for the fact that virtual/mta will not be converted |
| 3 |
> > any time soon (if ever). Old style virtuals allow their providers to |
| 4 |
> > block all other providers by blocking the virtual. This isn't possible |
| 5 |
> > with the current format for new style virtuals so it isn't going to |
| 6 |
> > happen. editor didn't need that feature and thus could easily be |
| 7 |
> > converted... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Ah, okay. Pretty bad situation, though, isn't it? I mean, |
| 10 |
> with the way it is now, we've got some virtuals which |
| 11 |
> work with virtuals and some, which don't. Do you happen |
| 12 |
> to know, if there's a bug which should rectify this |
| 13 |
> broken situation? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If by 'broken' you mean 'inconsistent' then I can assure you that there are |
| 16 |
plenty of much more important bugs open... ;) But I guess bug #148251 should |
| 17 |
be of interest in reference to virtual/mta. Personally I happen to hate old |
| 18 |
style virtuals and want them dead asap. As you can see on the bug there's not |
| 19 |
much indicating that'll happen anytime soon though.. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives