| 1 |
On 07/29/14 11:18, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:00:26PM -0700, Edward MN wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 07/26/14 15:55, walt wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 07/26/2014 10:39 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> [894019.770058] [Hardware Error]: MC4 Error (node 0): DRAM ECC error |
| 6 |
>>>> detected on the NB. |
| 7 |
>>>> […] |
| 8 |
>>>> and this, my children, is why I am using ECC ram. |
| 9 |
>>>> […] |
| 10 |
>>>> And this evening, with a thunderstorm outside I got that beauty above... |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> Is ECC memory a drop-in replacement for ordinary RAM, or does it need |
| 13 |
>>> a special motherboard? |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>> yeah, requires a motherboard that supports ECC ram. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Big was my surprise to learn that our old Pentium 3 PC from 1999 has ECC |
| 18 |
> support in its three RAM sockets. The problem today is the artificial |
| 19 |
> paritioning of the market. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> It seems nigh impossible (at least in the Intel world, please correct me |
| 22 |
> regarding AMD) to have ECC RAM in a normal Home PC these days, especially in |
| 23 |
> an ITX form factor, as I am currently investigating. There are Xeons for the |
| 24 |
> 1150 “consumer socket”, but ECC is only supported by server chipsets such as |
| 25 |
> the C series. Those come either on ITX boards with abysmal I/O capabilities |
| 26 |
> for home use or on high-power workstation ATX boards that cost a small |
| 27 |
> fortune. *sigh* |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> I would have liked the aspect of a system that tells me when something goes |
| 30 |
> wrong, but there seems no such thing for my requirements. So I must help |
| 31 |
> myself with file checksums when dealing with my archive disks. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Unfortunately, I think it would be difficult finding a home-user board |
| 36 |
with ECC support. since, nowadays appears ECC is mostly for systems |
| 37 |
where data corruption is unacceptable, such a bank,etc |
Archives