| 1 |
Dave Nebinger wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>you may find this link very helpfull: |
| 3 |
>>> |
| 4 |
>>>http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_speed_up_portage_with_cdb |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>Ooh....VERY scary. Not where I want to go for a problem like this. |
| 7 |
>>I'll wait for the developers to make that sort of thing part of the |
| 8 |
>>baseline setup. I couldn't administer it if it broke. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Trust it, Mark, it works great! I've been using CDB for like 9 months now. |
| 12 |
> I've had only one problem with it (the recent python 2.3 to 2.4 upgrade, I |
| 13 |
> missed the fact that I was to run python-updater, so the CDB stuff was not |
| 14 |
> automagically upgraded on it's own). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It's very quick, EIX supports it, and it works like a charm. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I did this to a few of my servers and it works well. Then I did it to my |
| 19 |
internal portage mirror. When my internal machine sync against it, it |
| 20 |
runs very slow... I'm not overly surprised, but I'd like some |
| 21 |
clarification on why that's happening. I suppose the fix would be two |
| 22 |
separate copies of portage. One for the machine and one to serve out of |
| 23 |
rsync that doesn't have the cdb stuff. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
kashani |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives