| 1 |
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 07:19:00 -0400 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:30 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:59:07 AM Alexander Kapshuk wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> Just wanted to make sure I read the change logs shown below |
| 9 |
> >> correctly. So far, I've been using sys-power/upower. Attempting to |
| 10 |
> >> update sys-power/upower seems to require sys-apps/systemd to be |
| 11 |
> >> pulled in as a dependency, which I don't want to do. |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> If I understand the change log below correctly, I should uninstall |
| 14 |
> >> sys-power/upower and install sys-power/upower-pm-utils instead. Is |
| 15 |
> >> that right? Thanks. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> "emerge -1 sys-power/upower-pm-utils" should fix this. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
On my system, using -1 would lead to it being cleaned by --depclean |
| 20 |
eventually. kdelibs has an optional (USE flag-controlled) dependency |
| 21 |
on upower, but not on upower-pm-utils. But upower-pm-utils does seem |
| 22 |
to be a drop-in replacement for upower, as far as KDE is concerned. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> However, this probably should have been a news item before going into |
| 25 |
> the stable tree... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That would have been nice. |
Archives