Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:19:07
Message-Id: CAGfcS_mfYaZ5oZtw-D95YgoktaxbD5Yd_i49LEt-ouw4MnCotg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils by "J. Roeleveld"
1 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:30 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:59:07 AM Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Just wanted to make sure I read the change logs shown below correctly.
5 >> So far, I've been using sys-power/upower. Attempting to update
6 >> sys-power/upower seems to require sys-apps/systemd to be pulled in as a
7 >> dependency, which I don't want to do.
8 >>
9 >> If I understand the change log below correctly, I should uninstall
10 >> sys-power/upower and install sys-power/upower-pm-utils instead. Is that
11 >> right? Thanks.
12 >
13 > Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone now.
14 > A proper solution would have been to have the upower ebuild select systemd as
15 > a dependency ONLY when the systemd useflag is set.
16 > And depend on upower-pm-utils when it is not set.
17 >
18
19 Sounds like the original poster had the right answer. Starting a
20 systemd flamewar is not helpful.
21
22 "emerge -1 sys-power/upower-pm-utils" should fix this.
23
24 However, this probably should have been a news item before going into
25 the stable tree...
26
27 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@×××××.com>