| 1 |
On Thursday 07 July 2011 16:01:27 Dale did opine thusly: |
| 2 |
> As the list knows, I been having random lock ups on my system. I'm |
| 3 |
> in the process of one last emerge -e world but I'm not holding my |
| 4 |
> breath it will change anything. So, I'm wanting to try a unstable |
| 5 |
> version of both gcc and glibc. This is the list available: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
gcc-4.5.2 works just fine here |
| 8 |
glibc-2.13-r3 no problems |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
And you are not stuck once upgrading glibc. If stuff doesn't run, edit |
| 12 |
the magnificent version check in the ebuild and re-emerge it. It only |
| 13 |
causes problems if other stuff gets built against a newer glibc and |
| 14 |
you then want to downgrade |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> root@fireball / # equery list -p glibc |
| 21 |
> * Searching for glibc ... |
| 22 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3:2.2 |
| 23 |
> [-P-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.10.1-r1:2.2 |
| 24 |
> [-P-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.11.3:2.2 |
| 25 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3:2.2 |
| 26 |
> [IP-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.12.2:2.2 |
| 27 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/glibc-2.13-r2:2.2 |
| 28 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/glibc-2.13-r3:2.2 |
| 29 |
> [-P-] [ -] sys-libs/glibc-2.14:2.2 |
| 30 |
> root@fireball / # equery list -p gcc |
| 31 |
> * Searching for gcc ... |
| 32 |
> [-P-] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-2.95.3-r9:2.95 |
| 33 |
> [-P-] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-2.95.3-r10:2.95 |
| 34 |
> [-P-] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-3.1.1-r2:3.1 |
| 35 |
> [-P-] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-3.2.2:3.2 |
| 36 |
> [-P-] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-3.2.3-r4:3.2 |
| 37 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-3.3.6-r1:3.3 |
| 38 |
> [-P-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2:3.4 |
| 39 |
> [-P-] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-4.0.4:4.0 |
| 40 |
> [-P-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2:4.1 |
| 41 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.2.4-r1:4.2 |
| 42 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.3-r2:4.3 |
| 43 |
> [-P-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.4:4.3 |
| 44 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.5:4.3 |
| 45 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.3.6:4.3 |
| 46 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.2:4.4 |
| 47 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.3-r3:4.4 |
| 48 |
> [-P-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.4-r2:4.4 |
| 49 |
> [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5:4.4 |
| 50 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1-r1:4.5 |
| 51 |
> [-P-] [ ~] sys-devel/gcc-4.5.2:4.5 |
| 52 |
> [-P-] [M-] sys-devel/gcc-4.6.0:4.6 |
| 53 |
> [-P-] [M-] sys-devel/gcc-4.6.1:4.6 |
| 54 |
> root@fireball / # |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> I was thinking of running a older version of gcc first. Just to see |
| 57 |
> if that helps. Is there a advantage to running a different version |
| 58 |
> of glibc as well? I'm keeping in mind that once I upgrade glibc, |
| 59 |
> I'm sort of stuck. I was looking at either gcc 4.4.4 and/or glibc |
| 60 |
> 2.13-r3 as options. |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> Thoughts? |
| 63 |
> |
| 64 |
> While I am at it, I tried searching for bugs on bgo. I click the |
| 65 |
> search link and select for it to search all bugs, closed as well. |
| 66 |
> When I type in glibc and crash then click search, all I ever get is |
| 67 |
> the please stand by screen. I never get a list of the hits. I |
| 68 |
> tried several times. Is bgo having issues or do I have another |
| 69 |
> issue to add to the table? |
| 70 |
> |
| 71 |
> Thanks. |
| 72 |
> |
| 73 |
> Dale |
| 74 |
> |
| 75 |
> :-) :-) |
| 76 |
-- |
| 77 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives