From: | justin <jlec@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] gcc and glibc. Which unstable to pick? | ||
Date: | Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:06:27 | ||
Message-Id: | 4E16A028.5010108@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] gcc and glibc. Which unstable to pick? by Alan McKinnon |
1 | On 7/7/11 11:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 | > On Thursday 07 July 2011 16:01:27 Dale did opine thusly: |
3 | >> As the list knows, I been having random lock ups on my system. I'm |
4 | >> in the process of one last emerge -e world but I'm not holding my |
5 | >> breath it will change anything. So, I'm wanting to try a unstable |
6 | >> version of both gcc and glibc. This is the list available: |
7 | > |
8 | > gcc-4.5.2 works just fine here |
9 | > glibc-2.13-r3 no problems |
10 | > |
11 | |
12 | this has multilpe issues, which I hit myself. But there should be a |
13 | revbump soon which gets that fixed. |
14 | |
15 | justin |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc and glibc. Which unstable to pick? | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] gcc and glibc. Which unstable to pick? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |