1 |
在 2010年2月6日星期六 07:46:05,Harry Putnam 写道: |
2 |
> Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> writes: |
3 |
> > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:13:20 +0800, Leon Feng wrote: |
4 |
> >> I have seen this for weeks, but since I upgrade to portage-2.2* at the |
5 |
> >> same time, do not know whether it is related. My revdep-rebuild out is |
6 |
> >> listed below, anyone has a solution? |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Are you also running the testing gentoolkit? Otherwise you're trying to |
9 |
> > use the old revdep-rebuild wit the new portage, which may have |
10 |
> > unexpected consequences. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Have you run lafilefixer --justfixit? This should always be the first |
13 |
> > step when revdep-rebuild reports problems. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> You were speaking to Leon no me (The OP), but since my output was |
16 |
> identical, I'll report too: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'm running ~x86 on everything and latest version of gentoolkit (I |
19 |
> don't have gentoolkit-dev installed) |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I've emerged lafilefixer (thanks Steve) and ran |
22 |
> lafilefixer --justfixit |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Then ran revdep-rebuild again.... it still finds broken binutils so |
25 |
> I'm letting it `oneshot' the emerge. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Was the expectation that running `lafilefixer --justfixit' would stop |
28 |
> revdep-rebuild from continuously finding a broken binutils? |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Or was I expected to run lafilefixer --justfixit and then rebuild |
31 |
> binutils once more? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> In any case I did the later and now the oneshot has finished and a |
34 |
> rerun of revdep-rebuild again finds the same `broken' binutils.... |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Apparently no progress has occurred.. |
37 |
> |
38 |
Same here. I am running ~x86 too. |
39 |
lafilefixer --justfixit and reemerged glibc do no work. |
40 |
|
41 |
I will try out the patch in bug 298651 soon. |
42 |
|
43 |
Leon |