1 |
Albert W. Hopkins a écrit : |
2 |
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 15:15 +0100, Laurent Kappler wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Hi, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> I'm looking for some information about the configuration for a server |
7 |
>> used only for a huge database. |
8 |
>> I guess dépendanding on which database server used Mysql or Berkley the |
9 |
>> hardware should not be same. |
10 |
>> Or is it all about having a lot of RAM ? |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Could I do that using only Mysql or is it possible to have Mysql and |
13 |
>> Berkley, or should I have just Berkley ... ? |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Could you do *what*? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Do you mean Berkely DB? Berkely DB isn't really a DBMS. It's more of a |
19 |
> flat-file database. It's not even relational, it's key->value based. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_DB |
22 |
> |
23 |
> One could argue that MySQL isn't a real DBMS too but I won't get into |
24 |
> that ;-) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Anyway it's very difficult to answer your questions without knowing what |
27 |
> your requirments are (how large is "huge", how many simultaneous users, |
28 |
> anticipated queries/sec etc.) |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
:) |
34 |
I would like to know more about a configuration with Two servers one for |
35 |
DB and one for Apache. |
36 |
I would have no idea of the number of request right now, I would like to |
37 |
set up a scalable small structure first. |
38 |
But there might be from 5 to a 100 e-commerce application with like |
39 |
between 20 and 5000 products...so it can be small but it can looks huge |
40 |
to me :) |
41 |
|
42 |
For me Berkley DB was all loaded in RAM and those been very fast. |
43 |
Even experimental I would like to set up something performant. |
44 |
|
45 |
thx ;) |
46 |
Laurent |