| 1 |
On Donnerstag 27 November 2008, Grant wrote: |
| 2 |
> >>> I'm considering buying a solid-state drive to improve I/O performance |
| 3 |
> >>> and even reduce noise. Has anyone tried this? I was considering |
| 4 |
> >>> getting the lowest capacity I can find and putting most of the system |
| 5 |
> >>> on it. There is a roundup on tomshardware.com and it sounds like some |
| 6 |
> >>> are very much better than others. SLC sounds vastly superior compared |
| 7 |
> >>> to MLC, but also much more expensive. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Typically the reports I've read have been from people using CFcards - |
| 10 |
> > 4gig is now unbelievably cheap, and CFcards talk EIDE with only a small, |
| 11 |
> > cheap physical adaptor - on MythTV frontends & low-overhead servers. |
| 12 |
> > CFcards look ideal for these purposes because they're quiet - you want to |
| 13 |
> > minimise noise when playing back video in the living room, for instance. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Great idea. If I'm only putting the main system on flash, I could use |
| 16 |
> a CFcard instead of an SSD. Storing music and videos on flash will be |
| 17 |
> too expensive for awhile. How does CFcard performance compare to SSD |
| 18 |
> or conventional hard disk performance? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> - Grant |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
well, harddisks go up to what, 100mb/sec? |
| 24 |
cfdisk - 18mb/sec? |
Archives