| 1 |
Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well - a terminal is something to work with. And this has to |
| 3 |
> be functional and not "provide a change of pace". |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yeah. True. I like that thing though. Cause, since I use different |
| 6 |
backgrounds for each of my desktops, depending on what desktop I'm using, |
| 7 |
I'll get a different background. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
All this said, usability and functionalibility is fact (for the most part), |
| 10 |
and looks and such is opinion (for the most part-- again). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
You like to use a black-on-white background. Fine, I've used that before and |
| 13 |
it was great. I like to use IMO Transparency for a chance of pace. Great. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I'm guessing that this conversation was originally started to gather info on |
| 16 |
peoples preferences of X terminals, but I don't think it was started for a |
| 17 |
debate about transparency. Commenting on it, maybe. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
This is really all my fault anyways since I started commenting on it. At |
| 20 |
least I'm hopefully ending it. In a word: sorry. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Samuel |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
300GB Hardrive from Newegg.com <http://newegg.com/>: $115 |
| 26 |
32" HD LCD TV/PC Monitor: $1,199.99 |
| 27 |
2GB of RAM: $160 |
| 28 |
GNU/Linux Operating System: Priceless (and free!) |
Archives