1 |
On Aug 14, 2005, at 6:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:38:28 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> Unstable does not really cut it IMHO. I am a gentoo enthusiast |
7 |
>> through |
8 |
>> and through, but plonking something in portage with a ~ beside it |
9 |
>> does |
10 |
>> not constitute a release of a recent version IMHO. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> They're not "unstable", they are "testing", and that only applies |
14 |
> to the |
15 |
> ebuild itself, not the upstream package. If you want the latest |
16 |
> versions, |
17 |
> you need to run ~arch. Any distro that puts brand new packages |
18 |
> (with the |
19 |
> exception of security fixes) into its stable package tree has |
20 |
> thrown all |
21 |
> concept of QA out of the window. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> -- |
25 |
> Neil Bothwick |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Top Oxymorons Number 30: Business ethics |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
Hi Neil, |
31 |
|
32 |
Is there a way to explicitly search for ~arch releases or do I have |
33 |
set the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS variable in make.conf and hope for the best |
34 |
during emerge? |
35 |
|
36 |
Paul |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS variable |