| 1 |
On Jan 14, 2012 7:28 AM, "Paul Hartman" <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:06 PM, walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I just heard about opendns.org for the first time today, but their |
| 6 |
> > website makes it seem that I'm the only person in the solar system |
| 7 |
> > who's not already on the bandwagon. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Anyone know if they are as wonderful as they sound? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> If you are using ISP DNS and it is slow, or hijacking domains like |
| 12 |
> search engines, and if you like your DNS to be a content filter, then |
| 13 |
> sure. :) Google DNS is similar thing. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Personally I just run unbound on my PC and don't want it to block any |
| 16 |
> look-ups anyway. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Or, in my case, all ISPs in my country are required to use a DNS server |
| 20 |
called "Nawala" that performs web censorship. And, as one would expect, |
| 21 |
that totally breaks DNSSEC. Not to mention making DNS resolves becoming |
| 22 |
very slow. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
So, I used Google DNS and the famous 4.2.2.[1-6] servers. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Rgds, |
Archives