1 |
Abraham Gyorgy wrote: |
2 |
> Well I did a little Google'ing, and i found a blog. There the author |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> lapitopi gyuszk # snice -15 X |
6 |
|
7 |
As already pointed out, running process with a nice value less than 0 |
8 |
can only be done by root, and it's usually a really bad idea to run your |
9 |
entire X session as root. X (and applications running under X) involve a |
10 |
lot of code, and vulnerabilities can exist in this code. You don't want |
11 |
any vulnerabilities to be potentially exploited as the root user. Take |
12 |
the multiple X-terminal vulnerabilities reported last week by the Gentoo |
13 |
security team that could allow local attackers to hijack X11 terminals |
14 |
of other users. The moral is don't run as root unless you actually need |
15 |
to (and I'd argue that you should never need to run X sessions as root.) |
16 |
|
17 |
> After doing this, I ran htop and it told me that my X11 was running |
18 |
> with -15 niceness. I experience better "responsiblity" under all of |
19 |
> X11 (kde, firefox, konsole, anything). For example switching from an |
20 |
> existing Firefox window to (for ex.) Konsole or Xchat is much faster. |
21 |
> I have to add, I own a very slow computer, so I have to do everything |
22 |
> to speed up my system. It is very slow even with WinXP+official drivers. |
23 |
|
24 |
If the goal is to lower the priority of other tasks the computer may be |
25 |
doing at the same time, perhaps setting a higher nice value for them |
26 |
would offer similar results. In the case of compiling, portage provides |
27 |
an easy way to lower the priority with the PORTAGE_NICENESS value. |
28 |
|
29 |
> 2008/5/14 Uwe Thiem <uwix@××××.na <mailto:uwix@××××.na>>: |
30 |
> |
31 |
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Andrey Falko wrote: |
32 |
> > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Uwe Thiem <uwix@××××.na |
33 |
> <mailto:uwix@××××.na>> wrote: |
34 |
> > > On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote: |
35 |
> > > > Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level |
36 |
> > > > for X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, |
37 |
> > > > at least when I used Debian). |
38 |
> > > |
39 |
> > > Nice factor for X makes graphical software run fater? I don't |
40 |
> > > thinl so. Not at all. |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > Nice factor gives X priority, so if you are compiling something and |
43 |
> > X's priority is high, you'll be using X as if nothing was being |
44 |
> > compiled. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Only if you are root. As a normal user, you can only lower the |
47 |
> priority of a process. |
48 |
> |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Josh |