| 1 |
Rich Freeman <rich0 <at> gentoo.org> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >> Today's upgrade of openssl to 1.0.2g-r1 may cause some necessary |
| 5 |
> >> rebuilds to fail due to missing symbol errors. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7886940.html |
| 8 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576128 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> They changed ABI without changing SONAME, which is an absolutely |
| 11 |
> braid-dead thing for upstream to do, because it causes exactly this |
| 12 |
> kind of breakage. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Hmmmm. I've been working on my ebuild and end-o-mentoring quizes:: so in |
| 15 |
that vein, should not the gentoo dev have bumped the gentoo rev numbers, or |
| 16 |
did I miss-read the gentoo docs? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Everybody should be on the lookout for this update and carefully |
| 22 |
> follow the forum post instructions to get through it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Again, in light of the dev-quizes, should not the package maintainer have |
| 26 |
posted a news item prior/simultaneously to the new package release? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Not trying to stir things up, just scratching many itches here on the |
| 30 |
dev-quizes. Surely we are all human(oid) and thus forginving of our |
| 31 |
comrades....even to the point of encouragement? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
quizfully, |
| 36 |
James |
Archives