Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: openssl upgrade may miss some needed rebuilds
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 15:50:12
Message-Id: CAGfcS_nmHbkBvddK8eP0ZqMZHvFFmKP3ZewfQ+gPxXEfyn5r7A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: openssl upgrade may miss some needed rebuilds by Nikos Chantziaras
1 On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On 02/03/16 16:41, walt wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Today's upgrade of openssl to 1.0.2g-r1 may cause some necessary
5 >> rebuilds to fail due to missing symbol errors.
6 >>
7 >> Example: libcurl was broken and caused the rebuilds of virtualbox and
8 >> git to fail until I forced a rebuild of curl. Any installed package
9 >> that is actually linked against openssl will be affected by this,
10 >> notably curl or wget, which may prevent portage from fetching source
11 >> files.
12 >
13 > Does that mean that the library name is the same and the "preserve-libs"
14 > FEATURE doesn't kick in in this case?
15 >
16
17 https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7886940.html
18 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576128
19
20 They changed ABI without changing SONAME, which is an absolutely
21 braid-dead thing for upstream to do, because it causes exactly this
22 kind of breakage.
23
24 revdep-rebuild is incapable of detecting this kind of breakage. Your
25 linking will appear intact, but things will crash because the ABI
26 changed.
27
28 Everybody should be on the lookout for this update and carefully
29 follow the forum post instructions to get through it.
30
31 --
32 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: openssl upgrade may miss some needed rebuilds Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: openssl upgrade may miss some needed rebuilds James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: openssl upgrade may miss some needed rebuilds "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>