Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Beau E. Cox" <beaucox@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: Holly Bostick <motub@××××××.nl>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PORTDIR_OVERLAY
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:40:12
Message-Id: 200601091135.50779.beaucox@hawaii.rr.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] PORTDIR_OVERLAY by Holly Bostick
1 On Monday 09 January 2006 11:15 am, Holly Bostick wrote:
2 > Beau E. Cox schreef:
3 > > Hi -
4 > >
5 > > I'm working on a series of ebuilds for the more esoteric CPAN modules
6 > > that I use. In the Gentoo Developer Handbook there is a statement
7 > > about PORTDIR_OVERLAY:
8 > >
9 > > "In that directory, you must use the same structure (and categories)
10 > > as in /usr/portage."
11 > >
12 > > OK. But I really want to make a new category, i.e. 'cpan'; ( tried
13 > > it, doesn't work ). Is there a way to 'fake out' portage into using a
14 > > new category without breaking everything?
15 >
16 > Question #1-- what's wrong with dev-perl, where all the other modules
17 > are (and then naming the modules cpan-whatever, I suppose)?
18
19 Answer #1-- I am doing that now. It's OK, but I sometimes have the
20 same module that is already in dev-perl; I would like to be distinct
21 with my config/version/mods/patches/etc.
22
23 >
24 > Question # 2-- have you looked at g-cpan?
25 >
26 > app-portage/g-cpan
27 > Available versions: 0.13.01 0.13.02
28 > Installed: none
29 > Homepage: http://dev.gentoo.org/~mcummings/
30 > Description: g-cpan: generate and install CPAN modules
31 > using portage
32
33 Answer # 2-- No. But I will! Thanks, Holly.
34
35 >
36 > HTH,
37 > Holly
38
39 --
40 Aloha => Beau;
41
42
43
44 --
45 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] PORTDIR_OVERLAY Jan Callewaert <jan.callewaert@×××××.com>