1 |
On Monday 09 January 2006 11:15 am, Holly Bostick wrote: |
2 |
> Beau E. Cox schreef: |
3 |
> > Hi - |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I'm working on a series of ebuilds for the more esoteric CPAN modules |
6 |
> > that I use. In the Gentoo Developer Handbook there is a statement |
7 |
> > about PORTDIR_OVERLAY: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > "In that directory, you must use the same structure (and categories) |
10 |
> > as in /usr/portage." |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > OK. But I really want to make a new category, i.e. 'cpan'; ( tried |
13 |
> > it, doesn't work ). Is there a way to 'fake out' portage into using a |
14 |
> > new category without breaking everything? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Question #1-- what's wrong with dev-perl, where all the other modules |
17 |
> are (and then naming the modules cpan-whatever, I suppose)? |
18 |
|
19 |
Answer #1-- I am doing that now. It's OK, but I sometimes have the |
20 |
same module that is already in dev-perl; I would like to be distinct |
21 |
with my config/version/mods/patches/etc. |
22 |
|
23 |
> |
24 |
> Question # 2-- have you looked at g-cpan? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> app-portage/g-cpan |
27 |
> Available versions: 0.13.01 0.13.02 |
28 |
> Installed: none |
29 |
> Homepage: http://dev.gentoo.org/~mcummings/ |
30 |
> Description: g-cpan: generate and install CPAN modules |
31 |
> using portage |
32 |
|
33 |
Answer # 2-- No. But I will! Thanks, Holly. |
34 |
|
35 |
> |
36 |
> HTH, |
37 |
> Holly |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Aloha => Beau; |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |