1 |
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 10:46:38 AM Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:27 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> > Actually, there are several large corporations that use RDP-like |
4 |
> > technologies. Although those are called "VDI" and usually use XenDesktop |
5 |
> > on the server side and "icaclient" on the client. |
6 |
> > Runs through HTTPS and apart from keyloggers and screenloggers, there is |
7 |
> > not much that can be done. |
8 |
> > Using 2-factor authentication (RSA-type keys or similar) they're pretty |
9 |
> > secure. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Yeah, I would agree with that. I've set up a few thin client citrix |
12 |
> boxes ages ago. These days I'd say the web is the bigger trend, and I |
13 |
> agree that 2-factor can greatly reduce the impact of keylogging. One |
14 |
> of the nice things with one of the SaaS applications we're using at |
15 |
> work is that if we're having connection issues I can just wake up my |
16 |
> console on my home PC next to my VPN'ed laptop and see if the |
17 |
> application is accessible with a complete different route (suffice it |
18 |
> to say I sometimes dread using the office LAN for this reason - I've |
19 |
> seen file transfers go faster over the VPN than the local WiFi). |
20 |
> |
21 |
> But, if you're still stuck with win32 applications Citrix is certainly |
22 |
> a solution. I was thinking it might take over the corporate desktop |
23 |
> until everything started moving more towards the web. |
24 |
|
25 |
XenDesktop is actually a lot nicer than the classical "Citrix". |
26 |
You end up with a full VM rather than a multi-user hack on top of a single |
27 |
user OS. |
28 |
|
29 |
I prefer to work using VDI/icaclient than with the company supplied laptops. |
30 |
Especially since my own laptop and desktop is nicer to type with and the |
31 |
screen is better quality... |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Joost |