1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Hi, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> I run --depclean -p every once in a while just to clean out any |
7 |
>> cruft. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> This has me confused: |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>>>>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged: |
12 |
>>>>>> |
13 |
>>> sys-kernel/gentoo-sources |
14 |
>>> selected: 2.6.23-r6 |
15 |
>>> protected: none |
16 |
>>> omitted: 2.6.23-r3 2.6.23-r8 |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> sys-libs/pwdb |
19 |
>>> selected: 0.62 |
20 |
>>> protected: none |
21 |
>>> omitted: none |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>>> dev-java/jakarta-regexp |
24 |
>>> selected: 1.3-r4 |
25 |
>>> protected: none |
26 |
>>> omitted: none |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
>> I get the gentoo-sources, no big deal. The java thing wouldn't |
31 |
>> exactly break my system either but the pwdb which pam depends on, |
32 |
>> well, wouldn't that be bad to remove? |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> What's the deal? Remove it? Remove it and death will be painful and |
35 |
>> slow? o_O |
36 |
>> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> It's safe to delete. The pam_pwdb module is not used any more. There's a |
39 |
> nice bug message in the ebuild that describes it. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Did you follow the PAM Upgrade guide (URL in the ebuild) way back when? |
42 |
> If so, just unmerge pwdb |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
|
46 |
I'm not 100% sure if I did or not on the upgrade guide. I do update a |
47 |
couple times a week tho. If it has been a while, I may not remember it |
48 |
if I did. I do read the messages so if it was in there, I most likely did. |
49 |
|
50 |
Would have been cute to remove it tho and not be able to log back in. I |
51 |
learned the hard way to do a pretend first. Sort of make sure it is |
52 |
going to still work after words. |
53 |
|
54 |
Thanks for the info. |
55 |
|
56 |
Dale |
57 |
|
58 |
:-) :-) |
59 |
|
60 |
Oh, still no DSL here. They been working on the box tho. Maybe soon. |
61 |
-- |
62 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |