1 |
On Sunday 23 December 2007, maxim wexler wrote: |
2 |
> > I doubt that would work. The virtual machine |
3 |
> > identifies itself as |
4 |
> > different "hardware" from the host, so the MS |
5 |
> > profit-protection would |
6 |
> > kick in, claiming you were trying to run the same |
7 |
> > copy of the OS on two |
8 |
> > different computers. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > -- |
12 |
> > Neil Bothwick |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Mebbe I'm confusing wine with vmware. I need to run a |
15 |
> XP-specific CAD program. So, it has to be installed in |
16 |
> XP and XP must be installed on the first partition of |
17 |
> the HDD, right? |
18 |
|
19 |
No, it can be installed wherever you want it to be installed, (but not sure if |
20 |
you can install it directly on a second drive. The catch is that it will |
21 |
want to be on the first drive, first partition, or otherwise will try to |
22 |
write its bootloader files there. If the first drive is not |
23 |
recognisable/writeable by XP it will have a hissy fit and will bail out. The |
24 |
(easy) solution is to install it on the first drive and then use partimage to |
25 |
create an image of it, which thereafter can be unloaded in whichever |
26 |
partition/drive you desire. Use Grub to chainload it accordingly. |
27 |
-- |
28 |
Regards, |
29 |
Mick |