Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 19:21:19
Message-Id: 52487C92.1020407@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 by Volker Armin Hemmann
1 On 29/09/2013 12:55, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
2 > Am 29.09.2013 10:28, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
3 >> On 29/09/2013 10:25, Mick wrote:
4 >>> On Sunday 29 Sep 2013 06:29:37 Walter Dnes wrote:
5 >>>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 06:09:40PM -0500, Dale wrote
6 >>>>
7 >>>>> Most likely, I'll install Kubuntu to start. Then I may roam around
8 >>>>> and test other distros until I find one I like. Thing is, I already
9 >>>>> have a starting point.
10 >>>> I'm already looking. http://forums.funtoo.org/viewtopic.php?id=2265
11 >>>> and they also dislike systemd. I think I could get to like it. See
12 >>>> also http://bugs.funtoo.org/browse/FL-34
13 >>> Very interesting! This looks as a logical way to put udev back in its
14 >>> userspace box and stop it breaking the OS, or did I understand it incorrectly?
15 >>>
16 >> Exherbo might be worth a look too[1].
17 >>
18 >> It's a sort-of Gentoo fork using the portage tree and PMS; plus Ciaran
19 >> strikes me as the kind of guy who *would* expend massive effort to find
20 >> a way round current udev and systemd.
21 >>
22 >>
23 >> [1] I didn't look myself. I have no idea what Exherbo's stance is on
24 >> this matter.
25 >>
26 >>
27 >>
28 >
29 > why do you bring up udev and systemd AT ALL?
30 >
31 > They are not the problem or the reason why seperate /usr is prone to break.
32
33
34 I fell victim to the sheer amount of fud around systemd and udev and
35 typed without thinking enough.
36
37 s/current udev and systemd/the root cause/g
38
39
40 --
41 Alan McKinnon
42 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com